it is inhuman to find mate in 8 on the board. may be it can be marked as inaccuracy (or better - as a fine move, green in chesscom), not a blunder for sure. if someone will find all mate in 8 against me, i would say it is probably a cheater. blunder in case if you blundered winning position into draw or losing, but definitely not when you are getting mate in 10 instead of mate in 8
3 Likes
I totally agree.
I think that it is often reference as a missed move on chess dot com which make sense. I also totally agree. Getting a huge advantage instead of a impossible mate to calculate for a human, should not be a blunder. I still do understand that it is a really sub-optimal move but…
And for sure delivering mate in 1 should not be marked as a blunder, as it was in my case.
That was not supposed to break between 1.6.1 and before - I will mention it to the firmware engineer
1 Like
We are looking into it, but held up until the Chess.com disconnects are resolved. I am expecting us to be a couple of weeks out at least for the 2 player AI fixes.
AI assistance fixes are coming soon as long as you use it on WiFi.
Are we still in the 2.0 section as of now? I’m really wanting Chess.com bots to save for analysis(4.0 I think?), but at this rate it may be a couple of months.
I agree. but not twice. continuous and full screen until you press anywhere. though ut should be possible to turn it off for photosensitive people
I think their timetable is still pretty on track - 2.0 - 3.0 in January - still a few days for 3.0 to be released.
1 Like
Just out of curiosity. Any bugs happening with chess.com disconnects etc probably will benefit the lichess implementation right?
Yes - indeed. Lichess might have some unique things, but you should expect it to be very stable
2 Likes
I for one would like to prioritize puzzles so that the board and app (for chessup 1) can pull puzzles from lichess and chess dot com and mirror the puzzle solution offered by the websites. If that is a huge task an intermediate solution would be to allow the position to be played against the strong AI with takebacks enabled so we could test out thinking.
Also, I am tired of waiting for the checkers forced capture rule on the v1 board. I would have held off buying the v1 board if I knew checkers was broken and would not be fixed until the second board came out … This should have been the default rule anyway.
2 Likes
@Jeff how’s the roadmap timeline changing right now as we have almost March and you released version that was about to be released in January?
3 Likes